Epstein Secrets

dant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. E

also Tucker, 175 So. 3d at 306 13 EFTA00808484 (final judgment reversed because case noticed for trial before answer to counterclaim was filed); Gawker Media, LLC, 170 So. 3d at 129-30 (granting mandamus to enforce Rule 1.440 and holding that an appeal after final judgment would be insufficient to remedy

erger, Esq. KITERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein 30 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK One E. Broward Boulevard, Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale. FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Bradley J. Edwards,

ett v. Continental Chemicals, Inc., 19 492 So.2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 1 204 So.3d 476 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea 20, 21, 22 170 So.3d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) Grossman v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 14 570 So.2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) Haft v. Adam

dant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LLC 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. E

ance"); Genuine Pans Co. v. Parsons, 917 So. 2d 419, 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)(issuing a writ of mandamus to enforce strict toning of Rule 1.440(c)); Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125, 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)("[A] party is absolutely entitled to strict conformance with the terms of rule 1.440, includ

ton & Rockenbach P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards EFTA00793714 Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LLC Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik o- ounse or e en an ounter- 01 1 1 ard, Suite 700 ounse or e en ant Scott Rothstein Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Ja

Schoof, 190 So. 3d 169, 170 (Ha. 5th DCA 2016) ("Strict compliance with rule 1.440 is required and failure to adhere to it is reversible error."); Gawker Media, LLC v. Bollea, 170 So. 3d 125, 131 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ("[A] party is absolutely entitled to strict conformance with the terms of rule 1.440, inclu

or ee ant Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottin er LLC o- ounse or ee nt ounter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik . Nurik yard, Suite 700 01 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Jack A. Goldberger Atterbur , Goldber er & Weiss, P.A. Suite 1400 01 Co-Cou

nscript. Epstein will supplement his Appendix with the Court's Order once entered. 7 See Bennett, 492 So. 2d at 727; Teelucksingh, 21 So. 3d at 37; Gawker Media, LLC, 170 So. 3d at 131; Genuine Pans Co., 917 So. 2d at 421. 7 EFTA00793773 The purpose of mandamus is "to enforce the respondent's unqualified