Epstein Secrets

est Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards 6 EFTA00808724 Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Edwards Pottinger LLC Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-326

uest for Admission and requires Epstein to substantively answer, Epstein would consistently assert his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976); Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). 4 EFTA00808722 Florida Statutes section 90.901 p

Goldberger & Weiss, M. 250 Australian Avenue S., Suite 1400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jea•ey Epstein Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein EFTA00808731

er registration page, Epstein], if required to answer, would substantively and consistently assert his Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976); Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479, 486 (1951). 4 EFTA00808729 records to self-authenticate (§

444 West Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Edwards Pottinger LLC Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301-32

t or deny this request because it requires the disclosure of information which could communicate a statement of fact that is testimonial in nature. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976). Epstein has a substantial and EFTA00792608 reasonable basis for concern that the statements of fact th

r to the proceeding. I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was emailed and ft-- mailed this of clay of February, 2011 to Marc S. Nurik, Esq., One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301; and Jack Scarola, Esquire, 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard, P.O. Drawer 36

asis for protecting Diaz's earlier communications because those communications were not made for the purpose of receiving said legal services). See Fisher v. U.S., 425 U.S. 391, 403 (attorney-client privilege "protects only those disclosures necessary to obtain informed legal advice which might not hav