Epstein Secrets

aintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Edwards Pottinger LW 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301-3268 [email protected] Marc S. Nurik Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 [email protected] [email protected] Couns

r cases as possible solely to impermissibly "inflame[] the jury or appeal [] improperly to the jury's emotions," or "solely to prove bad character." Wright v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009). "[I]f the introduction of the evidence tends in act

est Railroad Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Co-Counsel for Defendant1Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards 8 EFTA00808702 Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Edwards Pottinger LLC Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 One E. Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale. FL 33301-32

has probable cause to bring a suit when he has "a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances known to him, in the validity of the claim." Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (citing Goldstein v. Sabena, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)). A litigant may rely on first-hand knowl

J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Bradley J. Edwards Marc S. Nurik Edwards Pottin er LLC Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik evard, Suite 700 301 o- ounse or e en an ouster-Plaintiff Counsel for Defendant Scott Roths

ation from other cases as possible solely to impermissibly inflame the jury and appeal to the jury's emotions, or solely to prove bad character. See Wright v. State, 3 EFTA00793361 19 So. 3d 277 (Ha. 2009); Byrd v. BT Foods, Inc., 26 So. 3d 600 (Ha. 4th DCA 2009). "If the introduction of the evidenc

dberger, Esq. KITERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. 250 Australian Avenue S., Ste. 1400 West Palm Beach FL 33401 Attorneys for Jeffrey Epstein 3 Marc S. Nurik, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF MARC S. NURIK One E. Broward Boulevard, Ste. 700 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein Bradley J. Edwards,

he Court can determine whether Plaintiff "had a reasonable belief, based on facts and circumstances known to him, in the validity of his claim." See Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (defining probable cause) (citing Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)). Bifurcatin

her Florida state and federal courts. See, SCI Funeral Svs. of Fla., Inc. v. Henry, 839 So. 2d 702, n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“As the Levin court cited Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1984), with approval, presumably the cause of action for malicious prosecution continues to exist and

No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Edwards’ Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment Page 15 of 15 COUNSEL LIST William Chester Brewer, Esquire Marc S. Nurik, Esquire [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] 250 8S Australian Avenue, Suite 1400 Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik West Palm Beach, FL 33401