Epstein Secrets

ployees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past

orneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. 11. "Fanner Jaffe" means the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, ■., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors, at

ployees, independent contractors, attorneys, partners, shareholders, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with Searcy Denney, including without limitation John (Jack) Scarola; and E. any other attorneys who disclosed to you that they represent or represented in the past

orneys, partners, shareholders, investigators, agents or other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with such law firm. 11. "Fanner Jaffe" means the law firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, P.L., and any of its past or present employees, independent contractors,

ded the cost of dealing with over 70,000 emails — a cost that could not be advanced by Rothstein's bankrupt firm, Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney told Law360 on Monday. "The strong language in the order was considered adequate protection to preserve the confidentiality of the documents," Scar

er Jaffe Wcissing Edwards Fistos & Lehrman PL said in its March 19 motion that recent developments in ongoing litigation between Epstein and former Fanner Jaffe partner Bradley J. Edwards, who represented several of Epstein's victims, showed that Fowler White retained a copy of the confidential documents and

t authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ David P. Vitale Jr. DAVID P. VITALE JR. Florida Bar No.: 115179 Primary Searcy Denney car• S- 717Brh &S m art ard Attorneys for Bradley J. Edwards 5 EFTA00795924 Case 09-34791-R BR Doc 6418 Filed 08/10/18 Page 6 of 7 SERVICE

Cause Hearing, as it is Edwards' position that only one (1) day is required. Edwards reasonably believes that this view is shared by, at a minimum, Fanner Jaffe and the Intervenors. Thus, rescheduling will conserve Court resources, as a single day should be sufficient. Conclusion Given the foregoing, Edwar