Epstein Secrets

portant al-Qaeda partners as bin Laden’s organization grew and expanded its global terrorist and military operations to regions as diverse *30 as the Philippines, Bosnia, Chechnya, Kosovo, Sudan, Ethiopia, Kashmir, Somalia, Palestine, Pakistan, Yemen, Kenya, Tanzania, Egypt, Indonesia, and Malaysia.! Plaintif

detail below.” (Together with NCB and Abdulrahman bin Mahfouz, Khaled bin Mahfouz and Yassin al Kadi are referred to here is ahe “NCB Defendants.”) Al Rajhi Bank played an analogous and equally important role in al-Qaeda’s financial infrastructure, by also providing financial services to al-Qaeda charity front

rtising these accounts, Al Rajhi Bank “provid[ed] a mechanism to allow al Qaida’s supporters to deposit funds directly into those accounts.” JA3828. Al Rajhi Bank’s operations are consistent with their support of al-Qaeda front charities. In 1999, Al Rajhi Bank was warned. by United States government officials “t

e + weight in MSCI weight in MSCI ADTVactive buying active days buying passive days passive days passive days Saudi EM buying US$m buyi buying buying AL RAJHI BANK 9.5% 0.1% 37.2 546.5 14.7 477.7 12.8 1,024 27.5 ALINMA BANK 2.0% 0.0% 223.0 116.9 0.5 102.2 0.5 219 1.0 ALMARAI 44% 0.1% ip. 255.8 33.1 223.6 28.9 47

nstituent of @ CHINA mw KOREA = TAIWAN @ INDIA m SOUTH AFRICA @ BRAZIL SAUD: @ MEXICO m RUSSIA = MALAYSIA (EM) m= INDONESIA ~ THAILAND m@ PHILIPPINES TURKEY © CHILE = POLAND & QATAR m UAE @ COLOMBIA = PERU m GREECE m HUNGARY EGYPT m@ CZECH REPUBLIC Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Resear

her-in-law Defendant Mohammed Jamal Khalifa. (Ashton Compl. F§ 310, 315, 317; Burnett Compl. Ff 234, 239, 241.) Mohammed Jamal Khalifa headed IIRO’s Philippines office, which served as a center of terrorist financing and training. (Ashton Compl. § 310; Burnett Compl. § 234; Federal Compl. §§ 135-36.) Khalifa

es assured of its subject matter and personal jurisdiction over NCB, Plaintiffs’ claims are doomed because the Court dismissed similar claims against Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and Arab Bank. NCB contends that Center for Reproductive Law & Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183, 194-95 (2d Cir.2002), supports its