Epstein Secrets

quality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths

n be more impartial, calm, and consistent and less abusive or mischievous than people in such positions. Equality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed 169 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016

Machines were simply faster at doing brute-force calculations, had prodigious amounts of memory, and were not prone to errors. One article described Deep Blue’s victory not as that of a computer, which was just a dumb machine, but as the victory of hundreds of programmers over Kasparov, a single individual.

quality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths

n be more impartial, calm, and consistent and less abusive or mischievous than people in such positions. Equality What did the thirty-three-year-old Thomas Jefferson mean in 1776 when he wrote, “We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed 169 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016

Machines were simply faster at doing brute-force calculations, had prodigious amounts of memory, and were not prone to errors. One article described Deep Blue’s victory not as that of a computer, which was just a dumb machine, but as the victory of hundreds of programmers over Kasparov, a single individual.

nsciousness (e.g. "The Ego Tunnel" by Thomas Metzinger [141) has something to say about that, but perhaps the best thought is that in writing this, Jefferson mistakes or misun- derstands the poetic / creative process. Writing a poem is not fundamentally an emotional, expres- sive explosion—it's a delibera

competition because of pancreatic cancer.) Chinook had no machine learned aspects. EFTA_R1_02074941 EFTA02702510 In 1997, Garry Kasparov lost to Deep Blue at chess—Kasp- arov was the reigning world chess champion. In one pivotal game Kasparov remarked on the "superior intelligence" of the machine duri

to be that history was made in public: Big visible wars and social shifts and revolutions. Pericles in the Athenian square; the churning protests of Jefferson’s Paris or the massing of armies. Now, however, subtle manipulations of technology, invisible to most of us and maybe even accidental, maybe weird, w

creators were limiting what it had been asked to do. At which point the AI would turn to thinking about how to escape those bounds. It would be like Deep Blue programmed to plan its own prison break. And as much as humans might try to stifle a smart machine, we’d be fighting to contain something more powerf