Epstein Secrets

that the application is timely." United States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (11th Cir. 1983). "T

uld try to influence individual grand jurors to vote against indictment. In re Sealed Case No. 98-3077, 151 F.3d 1059, 1070 (D.C.Cir. 1998), quoting Douglas Oil Co. of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 219 (1979). Mr. Epstein, on the other hand has his own personal privacy and reputational int

that the application is timely." United States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (I 1 th Cir. 1983).

and jurors to vote against indictment. 7 EFTA_R1_00004157 EFTA01731377 In m Sealed Case NO. 98-3077, 151 F.3d 1059, 1070 (D.C.Cir. 1998),quoting Douglas Oil Co. of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest 441 U.S. 211, 219 (1979). Mr. Epstein. on the other hand has his own personal privacy and reputational inte

that the application is timely." United States v. Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (11th Cir. 1983). "T

uld try to influence individual grand jurors to vote against indictment. In re Sealed Case NO. 98-3077, 151 F.3d 1059, 1070 (D.C.Cir. 1998), quoting Douglas Oil Co. of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 219 (1979). Mr. Epstein, on the other hand has his own personal privacy and reputational int

egin drafting reply pleadings. See United States! Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (nth Cir. 1983) (list

einger, 626 F. Supp. 2d 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand iury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Crimi

egin drafting reply pleadings. See United States' Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (1Ith Cir. 1983) (lis

inger, 626 F. Supp. 24i 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grand jury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Cri

egin drafting reply pleadings. See United States' Jefferson County, 720 F.2d 1511, 1516 (11th Cir. 1983) (lis

winger, 626 F. Supp. 24i 1231 (S.D. Fl. 2009): "The proper functioning of our grandiury system depends upon the secrecy of grand jury proceedings," Douglas Oil Co. I. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 218 (1979), and this expectation of privacy is generally codified in Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Cri