3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 8
Mentions
it — forcing the kind of reform a private equity firm would have (though, crucially, providing the cash that a President Romney would not have). The Economist magazine, which initially opposed that bailout, reversed itself because of the manner in which General Motors and Chrysler were made to cut costs an
ial_October_27,:2012.pdi Dear Friends There are real difference in philosophy and polities between President Obama and the Democrats with Governor Romney and the Republicans. President Obama and the Democrats believe that the government should do whatever it can to provide a safety net for the elderly
aid in its editorial titled The EFTA00701510 Final Debate about Mitt Romney, "he had little coherent to say and often sounded completely lost " If Mitt Romney's performance in the last debate doesn't seal his defeat, then nothing will..... And unlike the Wall Street Journal and FOX News, the fact that Mitt R
net for the elderly, unfortunate and poor, while Governor Romney and the Republicans truly believe that private s
to how he would make up the $5 trillion budgetary hole he proposes to dig by lowering marginal income tax rates 20 percent and cutting other taxes, Mt Romney has said he might not press to eliminate or curtail specific deductions or credits. Instead, he has suggested, taxpayers might be given a maximum am
in its "functioning of government" score, one of the five metrics on which countries are rated. Progress On Peace Measuring world peace is, as the Economist has pointed out, akin to describing "how happiness smells." Nonetheless, the Australia-based Institute for Economics and Peace publishes an annual
ates, not surprisingly, still the unchallenged global power. The issue is what to do with that power. The defeated challenger in the U.S. election, Mitt Romney, had a memorable and important turn of phrase when he said that you can't kill your way out of the problems of the Middle East. The point that neit
d a memorable and important turn of phrase when he said that you can't kill your way out of the problems of the Middle East. The point that neither Romney nor Obama articulated is what you do instead in the Middle East -- and elsewhere. Constant use of military force is not an option. See the example
Failures Go Far Beyond Iraq George Melloan EFTA00669738 June 26, 2014 -- 'What would America fight for?" asked a cover story last month in the Economist magazine. Coming from a British publication, the headline has a tone of "let's you and him fight." But its main flaw is that it greatly oversimplif
most people will understand her situation pretty quickly — she wasn't born rich but has become very rich — and are unlikely to hold it against her. Mitt Romney did not lose the last election because of his wealth. Hispanics and Asians did not vote against him in record numbers because he was a successful
h — and are unlikely to hold it against her. Mitt Romney did not lose the last election because of his we
Entities connected to both Economist and Mitt Romney

Barack Obama
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Bill Clinton
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Marc Rich
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Benjamin Netanyahu
PERSON
Hillary Clinton
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Bloomberg L.P.
ORGANIZATION
Ronald Reagan
PERSON
John F. Kennedy
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Tehran
LOCATION
Middle East
LOCATION
Vladimir Putin
PERSON
Colorado
LOCATION