5
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
it would have to share with the Irvine firm. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026005 --- PAGE BREAK --- “They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money,” attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson — a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator D
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026006 →_026005 --- PAGE BREAK --- “They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money,” attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson — a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David Boies — argued that the bank resorted to “pure
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026006 →lationship because it abhorred how much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm. "They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money," attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator Da
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030099 →o share with the Irvine firm. "They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money," attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David Boies - argued that the bank resorted to "pure
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030099 →lationship because it abhorred how much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm. "They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money," attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator Da
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030102 →o share with the Irvine firm. "They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money," attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David Boies - argued that the bank resorted to "pure
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030102 →lationship because it abhorred how much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm. "They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money," attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator Da
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030106 →o share with the Irvine firm. "They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money," attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson - a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator David Boies - argued that the bank resorted to "pure
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030106 →propriation and misrepresentation claims. Trial began on July 26 in U.S. District Court for Central District of California. On Aug. 10, Ruemmler and Isaacson summed up their opposing positions in closing arguments. Let’s take a look. Isaacson, who did not respond to a request for comment, led with one of
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012039 →ationship because it abhorred how much money it would have to share with the Irvine firm. “They wanted SpanCash and they wanted the money,” attorney William A. Isaacson said in his closing arguments Wednesday. Isaacson — a partner with powerhouse law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner, chaired by high-profile litigator D
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012042 →Entities connected to both William A. Isaacson and Walter Isaacson

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
David Boies
PERSONFarooq Bajwa
PERSON
Barack Obama
PERSONSpanCash
ORGANIZATION
InfoSpan
ORGANIZATION
Lubna Qassim
PERSONScudder
PERSON
Kathryn Ruemmler
PERSON
Latham & Watkins
ORGANIZATION
Orange County
LOCATION
Emirates NBD
ORGANIZATION
Larry Scudder
PERSON
Los Angeles Times
ORGANIZATIONSchecter
PERSON
Middle East
LOCATIONAce Greenberg
PERSON
Phil Hirschkorn
PERSON
Western Union
ORGANIZATION
McKinsey & Co.
ORGANIZATION