Epstein Secrets

cause for a warrantless arrest is neither dispositive of, nor generally relevant to, this issue." Hawxhurst, 159 So. 3d at 1014. See also State v. Jennings, 968 So. 2d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("The officers in this case had probable cause to search the occupants of the vehicle once they smelled the

heard argument solely as to the litigation privilege. 2 EFTA00808206 the litigation privilege based upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Final judgment was thereafter entered in favor of Epstein. Edwards appealed the judgment as it pertained to his

e cause for a warrantless arrest is neither dispositive of, nor generally relevant to, this issue." Hawxhurst, 159 So. 3d at 1014. See also State v. Jennings, 968 So. 2d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("The officers in this case had probable cause to search the occupants of the vehicle once they smelled th

order granting summary judgment in favor of Epstein upon application of the litigation privilege based upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Final judgment was thereafter entered in favor of Epstein. Edwards appealed the judgment as it pertained to his

e cause for a warrantless arrest is neither dispositive of, nor generally relevant to, this issue." Hawxhurst, 159 So. 3d at 1014. See also State v. Jennings, 968 So. 2d 694, 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) ("The officers in this case had probable cause to search the occupants of the vehicle once they smelled th

EFTA00583962 summary judgment in favor of Epstein upon application of the litigation privilege based upon the then binding precedent of Wolfe v. Foreman, 128 So. 3d 67 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013). Final judgment was thereafter entered in favor of Epstein. Edwards appealed the judgment as it pertained to his