Epstein Secrets

From: Kathy Ruemmler < Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 3:06 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: TV Apparently the girls loved 5= Leonard. Am joining up with them now. On

Mar 13, 2017, at 10:47 AM, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wro=e: <=iv dir="ltr">yes and big as possible On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Kathy=Ruemmler <mailtc l» wrote: OLED? <=lockquote type="cite"> On Mar 13, 2017, at 10:20 AM, jeffrey E. «= hrefemailto:[email protected]" target="_blank">

="m_4818629344757761912m_9164007338040602904gmail_msg">See if yo= can narrow your search to present me with the overall thickness of the tel=vision. Gabby has specified that the existing wall will be padded approxima=ely 2", and many LED type televisions fall within that dimension. If, howev=r, you opt

From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 1:37 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Fwd: TV Advice on what type of tv to buy for m= bedroom (in DC)? I don

hose little bytes have been neatly=packaged, game on. See if you can narrow your search to pre=ent me with the overall thickness of the television. Gabby has specified th=t the existing wall will be padded approximately 2", and many LED type tele=isions fall within that dimension. If, however, you op

From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 2:41 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: TV OLED? On Mar 13, 2017, at 10:20 AM, =effrey E. <[email protected] <ma

ose =ittle bytes have been neatly packaged, game on. See if you can narrow your =earch to present me with the overall thickness of the television. Gabby =as specified that the existing wall will be padded approximately 2", =nd many LED type televisions fall within that dimension. If, however, =ou opt

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 2:47 PM To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: TV yes and big as possible On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Ka=hy Ruemmler wrote: OLED? On Mar 13, 2017, at 10:20 AM, jeffrey =.

y packaged, ga=e on. EFTA_R1_01904121 EFTA02657786 See if you can narrow your search to present =e with the overall thickness of the television. Gabby has specified that t=e existing wall will be padded approximately 2", and many LED type te=evisions fall within that dimension. If, however, you opt

From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 2:48 PM To: Jeffrey E. Subject: Re: TV I just looked and those are crazy expensive. Does your =ech guy still work

ose little bytes have been neatly =ackaged, game on. See if you can narrow your =earch to present me with the overall thickness of the television. Gabby =as specified that the existing wall will be padded approximately 2", =nd many LED type televisions fall within that dimension. If, however, =ou opt

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 2:56 PM To: Kathy Ruemmler; james ce I personal genius Subject: Re: TV james kathy , kathy james On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:48 AM, =athy Ruemmler wrote: I just look=d and

hose li=tle bytes have been neatly packaged, game on. See if you can narrow your search to=present me with the overall thickness of the television. Gabby has specifi=d that the existing wall will be padded approximately 2", and many LE= type televisions fall within that dimension. If, however, you opt

From: Kathy Ruemmler Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 3:02 PM To: Jeffrey E. Cc: James ce I personal genius Subject: Re: TV Thanks, Jeffrey! Jame=, I will email you

hose little bytes have been=neatly packaged, game on. See if you can narrow your search to present me with the ov=rall thickness of the television. Gabby has specified that the existing wal= will be padded approximately 2", and many LED type televisions fall within=that dimension. If, however, you opt