Epstein Secrets

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2018 5:26 PM To: Kathy Ruemmler Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: exactly my view. on facebook =1 thought you might look at the recent Internet and privacy opinions =and pose some open que

ffended by a prosecutor's "realistic likelihood of =98vindictiveness' " that tainted the "very in=tiation of proceedings." In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have "power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutiniz=ng any given individual... we

From: Kathy Ruemm ler Sent: 6/23/2018 5:11:45 PM To: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Importance: — High Yawn. And David Rivkin is a hack. Z

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 6/23/2018 4:01:37 PM To: Kathy Ruemm|cr Sa Subject: Fwd: Re: Attachments: image003.png; image002.png; image001.png; image004.png Importance: — High ihtink weak thoughts? ---------- Forwa

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we

From: jeffrey E. [[email protected]] Sent: 6/23/2018 5:25:33 PM To: Kathy Ruennler Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: exactly my view. on facebook I thought you might look at the recent internet and privacy opinions and pose some open questions

as offended by a prosecutor’s “realistic likelihood of ‘vindictiveness’ ” that tainted the “very initiation of proceedings.” In Young v. U.S. ex rel. Vuitton (1987), the justices held that because prosecutors have “power to employ the full machinery of the state in scrutinizing any given individual . .. we